Package Exports
- semantic-schema
This package does not declare an exports field, so the exports above have been automatically detected and optimized by JSPM instead. If any package subpath is missing, it is recommended to post an issue to the original package (semantic-schema) to support the "exports" field. If that is not possible, create a JSPM override to customize the exports field for this package.
Readme
Semantic Schema
Write JSON Schema In a Graceful Way.
JSON Schema is an excellent tool for validating the structure of JSON data. However, it is also veeeeeerbose. So here comes the semantic-schema. It let you semantically write JSON Schema so you can get rid of the verbose grammar.
This project attempt to achieve three goals:
- Use JSON Schema as an underlying data structure describer;
- Get rid of the verbose grammar of JSON Schema;
- Block some confusing feature of JSON Schema.
OK, let's begin with a compare between semantic-schema and plain JSON Schema. If I want a data to be an object, and has 'name', 'age' and 'gender' as its properties. And there is also some limit on these properties.
Let's declare it in JSON Schema:
let schema = {
type: "object",
additionalProperties: false,
properties: {
name: {
type: "string",
pattern: "^[A-Za-z]{5}$"
},
age: {
type: "integer",
minimum: 0,
maximum: 120
},
gender: {
type: "string",
enum: ['m', 'f']
}
},
required: ['name', 'age', 'gender']
}In semantic-schema, we declare it like this:
const {integer} = require('semantic-schema').schema;
let schema = {
name: /^[A-Za-z]{5}$/,
age: integer().min(0).max(120),
gender: ['m', 'f']
};Hmmm.... I prefer the second one :)
So let talk about the semantic-schema. There are three critical concepts: schema, sugar and validator:
schema
A schema is a describer describing what a data should be. It is a wrapper of JSON Schema providing a semantic way to declare it. Most of the time we don't directly use JSON Schema. But a method .normalize() is provided to convert schema to a JSON Schema object.
There are four types of schema:
- number
- integer
- string
- boolean
- null
- object
- array
- one_of: means that the data should match one of the declared schemas
- invalid: means that the data will always be invalid no matter what value it is.
declaring a schema:
const {integer, string, object} = require('semantic-schema').schema;
let schema = object().properties({
foo: integer(),
bar: string()
}).requiredAll();
// valid: {foo: 1, bar: '1'}
// invalid: {foo: 1}, {foo: '1', bar: '1'}, 1, '1', []...
schema.normalize(); // convert it to a JSON Schema object.Validator
A validator will compile a schema inside itself and provides a .validate() method for you to check your target data.
const SemanticSchema = require('semantic-schema');
const {integer, string, object} = SemanticSchema.schema;
const Validator = SemanticSchema.validator;
let schema = object().properties({
foo: integer(),
bar: string()
}).requiredAll();
let validator = new Validator(schema); // or Validator.from(schema)
validator.validate({foo: 1, bar: '1'}); // true
validator.validate({foo: 1}); // false
validator.errorsText(); // error details for the last validation.Sugar
A sugar is just a way to simplify your declaration of schema. Your code will still work well without it. But it makes your code more clear.
Below is a collection of sugar:
| sugar | equivalent |
|---|---|
| 1 | integer().enum(1) |
| 1.1 | number().enum(1.1) |
| 'foo' | string().enum('foo') |
| /^foo|bar$/ | string().pattern(/^foo|bar$/) |
| true | boolean().enum(true) |
| null | NULL() or empty() |
| {foo: 1} | object().properties({foo: 1}).requiredAll() |
| [1, 2, 3] | integer().enum(1, 2, 3) |
| [1.1, 2.2, 3] | number().enum(1.1, 2.2, 3) |
| ['foo', 'bar'] | string().enum('foo', 'bar') |
| [true, false] | boolean().enum(true, false) |
And you can use a sugar just like a schema:
const Validator = require('semantic-schema').validator;
let schema = {
foo: 1,
bar: ['hello', 'world'],
tar: /^[0-9A-F]{8}$/
};
let validator = Validator.from(schema);
validator.validate({foo: 1, bar: 'hello', tar: 'ABC12345'}); // true
validator.validate({foo: 0, bar: 'hello', tar: 'ABC12345'}); // false
validator.validate({foo: 1, bar: 'hi', tar: 'ABC12345'}); // false
validator.validate({foo: 1, bar: 'hi', tar: 'ZZZ'}); // falseIf your schema is complicated, I highly recommend you to use sugar in your code. Consider a schema of an object with an 'if' condition:
const {integer, object, string} = require('semantic-schema').schema;
let schema = object()
.if.properties({type: 'student'})
.then.properties({
type: 'student',
major: ['music', 'math']
}).requiredAll()
.elseIf.properties({type: 'staff'})
.then.properties({
type: 'staff',
major: ['music', 'math'],
salary: integer()
}).requiredAll()
.else.invalid()
.endIf;
// without sugar it would be:
let schema = object()
.if.properties({type: string().enum('student')})
.then.properties({
type: string().enum('student'),
major: string().enum(['music', 'math'])
}).requiredAll()
.elseIf.properties({type: string().enum('staff')})
.then.properties({
type: string().enum('staff'),
major: string().enum(['music', 'math']),
salary: integer()
}).requiredAll()
.else.invalid()
.endIf;
// it also works, but obscure.