The Problem

You've got some thing where you need to push a bunch of stuff into a queue and then shift it out. Or, maybe it's a stack, and you're just pushing and popping it.

Arrays work for this, but are a bit costly performance-wise.

The Solution

A linked-list implementation that takes advantage of what v8 is good at: creating objects with a known shape.

This is faster for this use case. How much faster? About 50%.

$ node bench.js
benchmarking /Users/isaacs/dev-src/js/fast-list/bench.js
Please be patient.
{ node: '0.6.2-pre',
  v8: '3.6.6.8',
  ares: '1.7.5-DEV',
  uv: '0.1',
  openssl: '0.9.8l' }
Scores: (bigger is better)

new FastList()
Raw:
 > 22556.39097744361
 > 23054.755043227666
 > 22770.398481973436
 > 23414.634146341465
 > 23099.133782483157
Average (mean) 22979.062486293868

[]
Raw:
 > 12195.121951219513
 > 12184.508268059182
 > 12173.91304347826
 > 12216.404886561955
 > 12184.508268059182
Average (mean) 12190.891283475617

new Array()
Raw:
 > 12131.715771230503
 > 12184.508268059182
 > 12216.404886561955
 > 12195.121951219513
 > 11940.298507462687
Average (mean) 12133.609876906768

Winner: new FastList()
Compared with next highest ([]), it's:
46.95% faster
1.88 times as fast
0.28 order(s) of magnitude faster

Compared with the slowest (new Array()), it's:
47.2% faster
1.89 times as fast
0.28 order(s) of magnitude faster

This lacks a lot of features that arrays have:

1. You can't specify the size at the outset.
2. It's not indexable.
3. There's no join, concat, etc.

If any of this matters for your use case, you're probably better off using an Array object.

Installing

npm install fast-list

API

var FastList = require("fast-list")
var list = new FastList()
list.push("foo")
list.unshift("bar")
list.push("baz")
console.log(list.length) // 2
console.log(list.pop()) // baz
console.log(list.shift()) // bar
console.log(list.shift()) // foo

Methods

• push: Just like Array.push, but only can take a single entry
• pop: Just like Array.pop
• shift: Just like Array.shift
• unshift: Just like Array.unshift, but only can take a single entry
• drop: Drop all entries
• item(n): Retrieve the nth item in the list. This involves a walk every time. It's very slow. If you find yourself using this, consider using a normal Array instead.
• slice(start, end): Retrieve an array of the items at this position. This involves a walk every time. It's very slow. If you find yourself using this, consider using a normal Array instead.

Members

• length: The number of things in the list. Note that, unlike Array.length, this is not a getter/setter, but rather a counter that is internally managed. Setting it can only cause harm.