Package Exports
- ink-visual-testing
Readme
Ink Visual Testing
Visual regression testing for Ink CLI applications with perfect emoji support.
Features
Visual regression testing helps detect unexpected changes in your UI:
- Prevent Layout Issues - Automatically detect border, alignment, and spacing problems
- Validate Dynamic Rendering - Ensure UI displays correctly with different data
- Catch Style Changes - Detect unexpected color, font, and style modifications
- Multi-State Testing - Test loading, error, empty states, and more
- CI/CD Integration - Automatically catch visual bugs before merging
Installation
npm install ink-visual-testing --save-devUsage
1. Basic Usage
import { describe, it } from 'vitest';
import React from 'react';
import { Box, Text } from 'ink';
import { visualTest } from 'ink-visual-testing';
// Your Ink component
const Greeting = ({ name, message }) => (
  <Box borderStyle="round" borderColor="cyan" padding={1}>
    <Text>Hello, <Text bold color="green">{name}</Text>!</Text>
    <Text dimColor>{message}</Text>
  </Box>
);
describe('Greeting', () => {
  it('should render correctly', async () => {
    // Mock data for the component
    const mockData = {
      name: 'Alice',
      message: 'Welcome to Ink Visual Testing'
    };
    // One line to create a visual test
    await visualTest('greeting', <Greeting {...mockData} />);
  });
});First run: Automatically generates baseline image at tests/__baselines__/greeting.png
Subsequent runs: Compares current output with baseline, failing if differences detected
2. Configuration Options
await visualTest(
  'component-name',      // Snapshot name
  <MyComponent />,       // React component
  {
    cols: 80,                  // Terminal width (default: 80)
    rows: 24,                  // Terminal height (default: 24)
    maxDiffPixels: 100,        // Max allowed pixel difference (default: 100)
    threshold: 0.1,            // Pixel diff threshold 0-1 (default: 0.1)
    backgroundColor: '#000000' // Background color (default: black)
  }
);3. Testing Different States
describe('Dashboard', () => {
  it('loading state', async () => {
    await visualTest('dashboard-loading', <Dashboard loading={true} />);
  });
  it('loaded state', async () => {
    const mockData = { users: 100, sales: 5000 };
    await visualTest('dashboard-loaded', <Dashboard data={mockData} />);
  });
  it('error state', async () => {
    await visualTest('dashboard-error', <Dashboard error="Network Error" />);
  });
});4. Testing Responsive Layouts
it('different terminal sizes', async () => {
  const mockData = { /* ... */ };
  // Small terminal
  await visualTest('small', <MyApp data={mockData} />, {
    cols: 60,
    rows: 20
  });
  // Large terminal
  await visualTest('large', <MyApp data={mockData} />, {
    cols: 120,
    rows: 40
  });
});5. Updating Baselines
When you have intentional UI changes, update baselines:
# Run tests
npm test
# Review the new generated images
open tests/__output__/*.png
# If correct, update baselines
cp tests/__output__/*.png tests/__baselines__/
# Commit the updates
git add tests/__baselines__/
git commit -m "Update visual baselines"Or use an npm script:
{
  "scripts": {
    "test": "vitest",
    "baseline:update": "cp tests/__output__/*.png tests/__baselines__/"
  }
}6. Understanding Test Failures
When visual tests fail, it means the UI output differs from the baseline. This catches both intentional and unintentional changes.
Example: Detecting Unintended Changes
Consider a SettingsDialog where someone accidentally modified settings values:
// Original fixture (created baseline)
const mockSettings = {
  general: { vimMode: true }
};
// Modified fixture (someone changed vimMode to false and added settings)
const mockSettings = {
  general: {
    vimMode: false,          // ← Changed!
    disableAutoUpdate: true,  // ← Added!
    debugKeystrokeLogging: true // ← Added!
  }
};Test output:
$ npm test
 FAIL  tests/SettingsDialog.visual.test.tsx
   × should render default settings dialog
     → PNG diff exceeded tolerance: 777 pixels differ (allowed 500).
        Diff saved to tests/__diff__/settings-dialog-default.png
 Test Files  1 failed (1)What happens:
- Baseline image: Shows original UI with vimMode: true
- Current output: Shows modified UI with vimMode: falseand extra settings
- Diff image: Highlights the differences in yellow/orange:- "Disable Auto Update (Modified in System)" - highlighted
- "Debug Keystroke Logging (Modified in System)" - highlighted
 
The test fails with a clear message: 777 pixels differ (allowed 500), pinpointing exactly how many pixels changed.
How to resolve:
- If change was unintentional (bug): - # Fix the code to match the baseline git diff src/components/SettingsDialog.tsx # Revert the changes 
- If change was intentional (feature): - # Review the diff image open tests/__diff__/settings-dialog-default.png # If correct, update baseline cp tests/__output__/settings-dialog-default.png tests/__baselines__/ # Commit the new baseline git add tests/__baselines__/ git commit -m "Update baseline after adding new settings" 
Key insight: The diff image makes it obvious what changed, helping you decide if it's a bug or an intentional improvement!
Real Failure Examples
Let's examine two concrete scenarios where visual tests catch problems:
Example 1: Content Difference - Text Changed
Someone modified the file count in a success message:
// Baseline fixture
<Text dimColor>
  Files processed: 10
</Text>
// Modified fixture (accidentally changed)
<Text dimColor>
  Files processed: 25 (DIFFERENT!)
</Text>Test output:
$ npm test
 FAIL  tests/VisualFailure.demo.test.tsx
   × should detect content difference (extra text)
     → PNG diff exceeded tolerance: 299 pixels differ (allowed 100).
        Diff saved to tests/__diff__/message-box-content.pngVisual comparison:
- Baseline: Shows "Files processed: 10"
- Output: Shows "Files processed: 25 (DIFFERENT!)"
- Diff: Highlights "25 (DIFFERENT!)" in red/yellow - clearly showing the text change
299 pixels changed because the characters "25 (DIFFERENT!)" replaced "10", affecting approximately that many pixels.
Example 2: Color Difference - Styling Changed
Someone changed the color of a status indicator from yellow to cyan:
// Baseline fixture
<Text bold color="yellow">
  Active
</Text>
// Modified fixture (color accidentally changed)
<Text bold color="cyan">
  Active
</Text>Test output:
$ npm test
 FAIL  tests/VisualFailure.demo.test.tsx
   × should detect color difference (cyan vs yellow)
     → PNG diff exceeded tolerance: 178 pixels differ (allowed 50).
        Diff saved to tests/__diff__/status-box-color.pngVisual comparison:
- Baseline: "Active" rendered in yellow color
- Output: "Active" rendered in cyan color
- Diff: Highlights the entire word "Active" in red - showing every pixel of the word changed color
178 pixels changed because each character pixel in "Active" has a different RGB value (yellow vs cyan).
Understanding Diff Colors
The diff image uses these colors:
- Gray background: Identical pixels (darkened for contrast)
- Yellow/Orange: Small differences (anti-aliasing, slight shifts)
- Red: Significant differences (different text, different colors)
More red/yellow = more pixels changed = larger visual difference
Best Practices
Key Points
- Use Fixed Mock Data - // Good: Fixed data const mockData = { timestamp: '2024-01-15 10:30:00', count: 42 }; // Bad: Dynamic data (different every time) const mockData = { timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), count: Math.random() }; 
- Create Separate Tests for Each State - // Good: Separate tests it('empty state', () => visualTest('empty', <List items={[]} />)); it('with data', () => visualTest('with-data', <List items={mock} />)); // Bad: Reusing names it('list', () => { visualTest('list', <List items={[]} />); visualTest('list', <List items={mock} />); // Name conflict! }); 
- Set Appropriate Tolerance - Static content (logos, icons): maxDiffPixels: 0(strict)
- Simple layouts: maxDiffPixels: 100(default)
- Complex layouts: maxDiffPixels: 500(lenient)
 
- Static content (logos, icons): 
- Ignore Generated Files - # .gitignore tests/__output__/ # Test output tests/__diff__/ # Diff images tests/__temp__/ # Temporary files # Baseline images should be committed !tests/__baselines__/
CI/CD Configuration
# .github/workflows/test.yml
name: Visual Tests
on: [push, pull_request]
jobs:
  test:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4
      - uses: actions/setup-node@v4
        with:
          node-version: '20'
      - name: Install system dependencies
        run: |
          sudo apt-get update
          sudo apt-get install -y libnss3 libatk1.0-0 libgbm1 fonts-dejavu-core
      - run: npm ci
      - run: npm test
      - name: Upload diff images on failure
        if: failure()
        uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
        with:
          name: visual-diffs
          path: tests/__diff__/*.pngProject Structure
Recommended directory structure:
your-project/
├── src/
│   └── components/
│       └── MyComponent.tsx     # Your Ink component
├── tests/
│   ├── simple-box-auto.test.ts # Visual test entry
│   ├── utils/                  # Shared helpers (diffing, snapshots, etc.)
│   │   ├── imageDiff.ts
│   │   └── visualSnapshot.ts
│   ├── vitest.setup.ts         # Test environment setup
│   ├── __baselines__/          # Baseline images (commit to Git)
│   │   ├── my-component.png
│   │   └── my-component-loading.png
│   ├── __output__/             # Test output (Git ignore)
│   └── __diff__/               # Diff images (Git ignore)
└── package.jsonMaintenance & Long-term Benefits
Initial Setup Effort
The effort required depends on component complexity:
Simple Components (No Context Dependencies)
Example: Basic message box without Context Providers
// tests/fixtures/simple-message.tsx
import React from 'react';
import { render, Box, Text } from 'ink';
render(
  <Box borderStyle="round" padding={1}>
    <Text>Success!</Text>
  </Box>
);// tests/SimpleMessage.visual.test.tsx
import { visualTest } from 'ink-visual-testing';
it('renders simple message', async () => {
  await visualTest('simple-message', './tests/fixtures/simple-message.tsx', {
    cols: 80, rows: 20
  });
});Effort: ~33 lines of code
Complex Components (With Context Providers)
Example: Settings dialog with VimModeProvider and KeypressProvider
// tests/fixtures/settings-dialog-default.tsx
import { useEffect } from 'react';
import { render } from 'ink';
import { SettingsDialog } from '../../src/components/SettingsDialog.js';
import { VimModeProvider } from '../../src/contexts/VimModeContext.js';
import { KeypressProvider } from '../../src/contexts/KeypressContext.js';
const mockSettings = createMockSettings({
  general: { vimMode: true }
});
const SettingsDialogWrapper = () => {
  useEffect(() => {
    const timer = setTimeout(() => process.exit(0), 1000);
    return () => clearTimeout(timer);
  }, []);
  return <SettingsDialog settings={mockSettings} onSelect={() => {}} />;
};
const { unmount } = render(
  <VimModeProvider settings={mockSettings}>
    <KeypressProvider kittyProtocolEnabled={false}>
      <SettingsDialogWrapper />
    </KeypressProvider>
  </VimModeProvider>
);
process.on('SIGINT', () => {
  unmount();
  process.exit(0);
});Effort for 7 test scenarios: ~483 lines of code
But this is a one-time investment with continuous benefits!
Maintenance Cost When Components Change
| Change Type | What to Update | Frequency | 
|---|---|---|
| Add new option/feature | Only baseline images | Common (80%) | 
| Style/layout changes | Only baseline images | Common | 
| Add new test scenario | 1 new fixture file | Occasional | 
| Modify component props | Batch find-replace in fixtures | Rare | 
| Change Context structure | All fixture files | Very rare | 
Key insight: Most changes (80%) only require updating baseline images—typically just a quick review before approving visual changes!
Why "One-time Setup, Continuous Benefits"?
1. Test Files Never Change
The test logic remains stable:
await visualTest('component-name', './fixtures/component.tsx', options);You only add new tests when adding new scenarios.
2. Fixtures Rarely Change
Most UI changes don't require fixture modifications:
- Adding new UI elements: No fixture changes needed
- Changing colors/styles: No fixture changes needed
- Modifying layout: No fixture changes needed
- Changing component API: Quick batch find-replace
- Adding Context Providers: One-time update to all fixtures
3. Baseline Updates Are Fast
# Run tests to see what changed
npm test
# If changes look correct, update baselines
cp tests/__output__/*.png tests/__baselines__/
# Commit the updates
git add tests/__baselines__/
git commit -m "Update baselines after adding dark mode"This takes 1-2 minutes vs. 15+ minutes of manual testing!
4. Automated Regression Detection
Once set up, every PR automatically checks for visual regressions:
- Catches unintended UI changes
- Prevents layout bugs
- Ensures consistent rendering across environments
- No manual testing needed
Tips for Minimizing Maintenance
1. Reuse Mock Data
// tests/mocks/settings.ts
export const defaultSettings = createMockSettings({ ... });
export const vimEnabledSettings = createMockSettings({ general: { vimMode: true } });
// In fixtures, just import and use
import { defaultSettings } from '../mocks/settings';2. Use a Fixture Template Create a base fixture and copy/modify for new scenarios:
// tests/fixtures/_template.tsx
import { useEffect } from 'react';
import { render } from 'ink';
import { MyComponent } from '../../src/MyComponent';
import { AllNecessaryProviders } from './providers';
const FixtureWrapper = () => {
  useEffect(() => {
    const timer = setTimeout(() => process.exit(0), 1000);
    return () => clearTimeout(timer);
  }, []);
  return <MyComponent {...mockProps} />;
};
render(
  <AllNecessaryProviders>
    <FixtureWrapper />
  </AllNecessaryProviders>
);3. Automate Baseline Updates
{
  "scripts": {
    "test:visual": "vitest --run tests/*.visual.test.tsx",
    "baseline:update": "cp tests/__output__/*.png tests/__baselines__/",
    "baseline:review": "open tests/__output__/*.png"
  }
}Advanced Usage
Lower-Level API
If you need more control, use the lower-level API:
import { fixedPtyRender, getCIOptimizedConfig } from 'ink-visual-testing';
import path from 'node:path';
// Render CLI app to PNG
await fixedPtyRender(
  path.resolve('examples/my-cli.tsx'),
  'output.png',
  {
    ...getCIOptimizedConfig(),
    cols: 120,
    rows: 60
  }
);Font Configuration
Uses system fonts by default (recommended). To use bundled emoji fonts:
import { getCIOptimizedConfig } from 'ink-visual-testing';
getCIOptimizedConfig('mono')   // NotoEmoji-Regular.ttf (monochrome)
getCIOptimizedConfig('color')  // NotoColorEmoji.ttf (color)
getCIOptimizedConfig()         // System fonts (default)Examples
See examples/ directory for complete examples:
- examples/dashboard.tsx- Complex dashboard layout with emoji and various layouts
- examples/dashboard-cli.tsx- CLI entry point
- examples/dashboard-snapshot.tsx- Snapshot generation script
Run examples:
# View live rendering
npx tsx examples/dashboard-cli.tsx
# Generate snapshot
npx tsx examples/dashboard-snapshot.tsxLicense
MIT License. See LICENSE for details.
Contributing
Contributions welcome! Please check GitHub Issues.