Package Exports
- jss-nested
This package does not declare an exports field, so the exports above have been automatically detected and optimized by JSPM instead. If any package subpath is missing, it is recommended to post an issue to the original package (jss-nested) to support the "exports" field. If that is not possible, create a JSPM override to customize the exports field for this package.
Readme
JSS plugin enables support for nested rules
Make sure you read how to use plugins in general.
Demo - JSS 
Use &
to reference selector of the parent rule.
const sheet = jss.createStyleSheet({
container: {
padding: 20,
'&:hover': {
background: 'blue'
},
// Add a global .clear class to the container.
'&.clear': {
clear: 'both'
},
// Reference a global .button scoped to the container.
'& .button': {
background: 'red'
},
// Use multiple container refs in one selector
'&.selected, &.active': {
border: '1px solid red'
}
}
})
.container-3775999496 {
padding: 20px;
}
.container-3775999496:hover {
background: blue;
}
.container-3775999496.clear {
clear: both;
}
.container-3775999496 .button {
background: red;
}
.container-3775999496.selected, .container-3775999496.active {
border: 1px solid red;
}
Use $ruleName
to reference a local rule within the same style sheet.
const sheet = jss.createStyleSheet({
container: {
// Reference the local rule "button".
'& $button': {
padding: '10px'
},
// Multiple local refs in one rule.
'&:hover $button, &:active $button': {
color: 'red',
},
'&:focus $button': {
color: 'blue'
}
},
button: {
color: 'grey'
}
})
.button-3940538223 {
color: grey;
}
.container-2645419599 .button-3940538223 {
padding: 10px;
}
.container-2645419599:hover .button-3940538223, .container-2645419599:active .button-3940538223 {
color: red;
}
.container-2645419599:focus .button-3940538223 {
color: blue;
}
Use at-rules inside of regular rules.
const sheet = jss.createStyleSheet({
button: {
color: 'red',
'@media (min-width: 1024px)': {
width: 200
}
}
})
.button-2683044438 {
color: red;
}
@media (min-width: 1024px) {
.button-2683044438 {
width: 200px;
}
}
Deep nesting
Deep nesting is not supported for multiple reasons:
- More than 2 levels of indentation lead to less readability from our experience.
- Components should never be big and so there should be no need for deep nesting.
- Even if they are big, deep nesting shouldn't be needed. Class names can be switched on nodes for different states.
If you can provide a real life example where you really need deep nesting - we would love to know it.
Issues
File a bug against cssinjs/jss prefixed with [jss-nested].
Run tests
npm i
npm run test
License
MIT